Seven Men Who Rule the World From the Grave — Episode 4: Freud
If Darwin reshaped how people thought about origins, Freud reshaped how they thought about themselves.
With Freud, the modern world turned inward. Truth, guilt, desire, and even religion were no longer primarily matters of revelation or conscience, but of psychology. The human mind became the new authority — and the unconscious its hidden engine.
From Sin to Symptom
Before Freud, guilt was largely understood in moral terms. One was responsible for choices, accountable to God, and answerable to truth. Freud reframed guilt as something else entirely: a psychological tension produced by repression.
In this framework, wrongdoing is not rebellion but malfunction. Sin becomes sickness. The solution is not repentance, but release.
This was not merely a new theory — it was a new lens.
Desire as the Interpreter
Freud taught that hidden desires shape thought, belief, and behavior. What a person claims to believe may only be a surface explanation for deeper impulses. Religion, in this view, becomes wish-fulfillment — a comforting illusion produced by unmet needs.
Once belief itself is explained away as psychological projection, truth no longer needs to be answered — only analyzed.
This move was decisive.
Authority Moves Inside
With Freud, authority shifted again. No longer anchored in Scripture, tradition, or even reason, meaning now resided within the self. The inner life became the final court of appeal.
But an inward authority is unstable.
If the self interprets everything, then nothing stands above it. Accountability dissolves, not because it is rejected, but because it is redefined.
Why Freud Still Rules
Freud rules from the grave every time moral failure is excused as trauma, every time guilt is treated solely as something to be managed rather than answered, and every time faith is dismissed as emotional dependence.
You don’t have to read Freud to think like him. His categories now feel natural — even compassionate — which is precisely why they endure.
Reading Scripture Responsibly
Scripture does not deny the inner life. It speaks of the heart, the mind, and hidden motives. But it never allows the inner life to become the judge of truth.
The Bible confronts us before it comforts us. It names sin before it offers grace. And it heals not by denial, but by forgiveness and transformation.
Where This Leaves Us
When psychology replaces theology, the Bible begins to feel harsh, outdated, or unkind. And when Scripture refuses to cooperate, it is often blamed — rather than the framework brought to it.
Stay with me.
In the next installment, we’ll look at a man who took the final step — not explaining God away psychologically, but declaring Him unnecessary altogether, and reshaping how modern culture understands truth and morality.
No comments:
Post a Comment